Coverage & Trigger FAQs
Frequently asked questions about how rainfall is assessed, trigger conditions, and payout logic for WeatherIt coverage.
How exactly is rainfall assessed?
Rainfall triggers are based on three criteria, all of which must be met for a payout to occur:
flowchart TB
A[Rainfall Assessment] --> B[Coverage Window]
A --> C[Rainfall Amount]
A --> D[Duration Requirement]
B --> E{All Three<br/>Met?}
C --> E
D --> E
E -->|Yes| F[Payout<br/>Triggered]
E -->|No| G[No<br/>Payout]
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style B fill:#fff4e1
style C fill:#fff4e1
style D fill:#fff4e1
style E fill:#f3e5f5
style F fill:#e8f5e9
style G fill:#ffebee
The Three Criteria
| Criterion | Description |
|---|---|
| Coverage window | Defined start and end time for coverage |
| Rainfall amount | Total rainfall must exceed the threshold |
| Duration | Rainfall must occur over a defined duration within the window (consecutive or non-consecutive) |
All Three Required
All three criteria must be met for a payout to occur. Meeting one or two criteria is not sufficient.
If it rained, why might the customer not be paid?
There are several reasons why rain may have occurred but a payout wasn't triggered:
flowchart TB subgraph Reasons["Possible Reasons"] direction TB A["Rain didn't meet<br/>amount threshold"] B["Rain didn't meet<br/>duration requirement"] C["Rain occurred<br/>outside coverage window"] D["Weather station data<br/>differs from location"] end style A fill:#ffebee style B fill:#ffebee style C fill:#ffebee style D fill:#ffebee
Common Scenarios
| Scenario | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Light rain | Rain may have fallen but not reached the amount threshold |
| Brief shower | Rain may have been heavy but not for the required duration |
| Outside window | Rain may have occurred before or after the coverage period |
| Location difference | Rain at the event location may differ from the nearby weather station |
Weather Station Data
WeatherIt uses data from official weather stations. It's technically possible for rain to fall at the customer's event location while the nominated nearby weather station records different conditions—or vice versa.
Does customer perception of "bad weather" affect outcomes?
No. Trigger assessment is based on objective, measured weather data—not customer perception.
| Factor | Affects Outcome? |
|---|---|
| Measured rainfall data | Yes |
| Customer's observation | No |
| Whether customer got wet | No |
| Whether event felt ruined | No |
Does it matter if the event or booking still went ahead?
No. Event operation decisions are completely separate from insurance triggers.
flowchart LR
A[Trigger<br/>Conditions] --> B{Met?}
B -->|Yes| C[Payout Occurs]
B -->|No| D[No Payout]
E[Event<br/>Proceeded?] -.->|Irrelevant| B
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style B fill:#fff4e1
style C fill:#e8f5e9
style D fill:#ffebee
style E fill:#f0f0f0
Key Points
- If trigger conditions are met, payout occurs regardless of whether the event proceeds
- As long as the customer does not cancel the event, they can choose to stay home or attend
- They will be paid for the coverage days where rainfall levels trigger a claim
Customer Choice
Customers don't need to "prove" the weather affected them. If trigger conditions are met, payout is automatic.
What data sources does WeatherIt use?
WeatherIt uses authoritative weather data from official sources:
| Aspect | Source |
|---|---|
| Data provider | Official weather stations |
| Coverage | Comprehensive network |
| Accuracy | Industry-standard measurement |
| Independence | Third-party verified |
Don't Speculate
Partners should not speculate about weather data or trigger outcomes with customers. If there's a question, escalate to WeatherIt.
Triggers are objective and rules-based. This ensures fair, consistent outcomes for all customers.
Updated 8 months ago
